The overriding principle of all waste management is: don’t create it if you can avoid it. And if you must create the waste seek ways to keep the quantity small.
Waste minimization is a buzzword, but it’s a buzzword that gives manager and operators a goal. Sometimes simple resdesign can reduce waste quantities; other times attention to post-generation handling can reduce needless dilution or mixing of the waste.
The US hospital industry has a website called Sustainability Roadmap for Hospitals. It claims "many hospitals routinely throw from 50-70% of their waste into" a regulated waste stream when the actual percentage of waste that need to be considered medical waste is closer to 10 percent.
Waste management programs should concentrate on the facility operations, in particular those that generate the most waste. An educational system for employees can try to influence behavior - to keep employees mindful about waste production and segregated correctly so as to reduce the load on downstream treatment processes.
Healthcare managers can also reduce the production of waste through adapting their purchasing and stock control strategies.
Inventory control techniques can help reduce waste. For instance, more frequent ordering of small quantities rather than less frequent, large amounts orders can result in lower levels of inventory, reducing the chances of product expiration. Using the oldest items in the inventory first, making sure to use all content of every container, and monitoring expiration dates can help reduce getting caught with excess product.
While purchasing methodologies differ from organization to organization, if you are looking to reduce waste, you may wish to look to centralize purchasing. An inventory control system can help you use all the contents of every container and reduce losses to product expiration. Keeping track of chemical use throughout the facility can help reduce production of hazardous or infectious waste.
Any competent regulator is going to look at a stream with more than one classification of waste in it and insist that management (storage and treatment and disposal) be appropriate for all types of waste. So a waste that included RCRA hazardous and pathological waste would have to satisfy regulations for hazardous waste and pathological waste before it is sent to disposal. Harmless healthcare general waste waste (e.g. paper from administrative activities) mixed with biological material can become infectious waste. The resulting volume increase can increase the disposal cost by an order of magnitude.
The ancient Greeks put medical instruments in boiling water to clean them. Even without the germ theory they knew from observation that heat tended to reduce the transmission of disease. Heat is used in treatment of infectious and other medical waste in many ways.
Boiling water is limited in temperature to 212 F or 100 C in an unpressurized container. (In a pressure vessel the boiling point can rise.) While this is hot enough to kill or deactivate most pathogens, to ensure the most hardy bacterial spores are eliminated a higher temperature is required. Autoclaves typically operate at 240 F. Incineration takes place at temperatures above 1000 F (and often 2000 F or more) which is far above the temperature required to kill organisms and denature viruses (with any appreciable time at that temperature, but the goal of incineration is other than sterilization.
Low-heat thermal processes find their way to use in many processes to clean facilities. Steam cleaning of room floors and walls is used to both clean (remove dirt) and disinfect.
Microwave treatment is a low temperature thermal process; the bulk temperature is about 100 C and disinfection is due to moist heat.
The closer (in both space and time) you address the waste, the better. By address, we mean treat or package for final disposal. This principle is a guide for planning and process design. It can be violated if the overall big picture considerations call for it.
When the risk is uncertain it must be regarded as significant and protective measures must be taken accordingly.
The principle was adopted by attendees at a 1998 conference in Wisconsin about public health and waste. Referred to as “The Wingspread consensus statement”, four central components of the principle were listed:
Large-scale management is often accompanied by formal risk management evaluation for presentation to a regulatory agency or insurance company.
Regular old municipal solid waste is cheap to store and dispose of. At-risk medical waste (infectious, pathological, hazardous, radioactive, or regulated) is much more expensive. How much more expensive? There is no general answer for that and both relative and absolute costs depend on geography, market supply and demand, and alternatives. A rule of thumb is that these waste cost ten times as much to dispose of as garden variety waste. If you are an ambitious waste management professional, you might want to try to calculate how much each each of your waste streams costs to store and dispose of on a per pound basis.